The information you provide to the chat will be recorded to improve your experience and to contact you. Please read our privacy notice to see how we are processing and protecting your data. Click to view our Cookie Notice.
We'd love your feedback—take a quick survey to help us improve.
How can we help you today?

What “one team” really means in drug development

Jason Parks, Executive Director, Biotech Operations, Clinical Research, Thermo Fisher Scientific

Industry Perspectives
Originally published on Outsourced Pharma on July 8, 2026.
Republished on Patheon.com with permission.

“One team” is a phrase that comes up often in drug development conversations. Its meaning, however, is rarely defined. For customers, the difference between teams that truly operate as one and those that don’t is immediately apparent.

In many programs, coordination becomes an invisible responsibility. It isn’t formally assigned, but it still has to happen—connecting decisions, aligning timelines, and reconciling inputs across functions. When teams don’t operate as one, that work often falls to the customer.

Working as one team doesn’t mean eliminating roles or blurring accountability. It means aligning early enough that decisions are made with a shared understanding of their downstream implications.

When teams operate in silos, information is repeated. Context is re-explained. Decisions made in one area surface later as constraints in another. Progress depends on ad hoc coordination that sits outside the formal process.

When teams operate as one, that burden shifts. Conversations start earlier. Clinical, manufacturing, and supply considerations are discussed together rather than sequentially. Issues are surfaced when there is still time to address them without disruption.

Communication is central to this way of working, but not in the form of polished updates or formal handoffs. What matters is accessibility: teams having familiarity with one another, willing to share information directly, pick up the phone, and resolve questions collaboratively.

A one team approach changes how development feels. Transitions between phases are smoother. Fewer surprises emerge late. Complexity isn’t removed, but it is managed earlier and more transparently.

“One team” is not about structure for its own sake. It is about creating the conditions where coordination replaces correction and where progress is built through shared understanding rather than escalation.

That operating reality underpins Thermo Fisher Scientific’s Accelerator™ Drug Development as a defining model of this moment. Built as a deeply integrated CDMO–CRO approach, it is designed to remove coordination from the customer’s shoulders by aligning scientific, manufacturing, and clinical decisions within a single development pathway.

To date, Accelerator™ Drug Development has supported hundreds of development programs for biotech and pharma customers, reflecting a growing recognition that true integration is not a promise—but an operating discipline that must be designed into how development work is done.

Read the original article on Outsourced Pharma.

Helpful resources

Drug development and manufacturing is an ever-changing industry. Stay connected to new discoveries, innovations, and expert scientific opinions.

Video
Expert perspective: Inside Accelerator™ Drug Development, 360° CDMO and CRO solution
Meet Thermo Fisher Scientific’s subject matter experts as they share insights, experience, and guidance to help biotech and pharma companies navigate every stage of drug development.
Whitepaper
Reshaping global value: Strategies for chinese innovative drugs to win in the global market
Explore the trends, challenges, and strategic considerations shaping the global expansion of Chinese innovative drugs. Learn how leading organizations are building the clinical, regulatory, manufacturing, and commercialization capabilities needed to compete worldwide.
Industry Perspectives
The new operational reality of drug development
What causes development programs to lose momentum? Often it's not the science. Explore the operational factors that increasingly shape timelines, risk, and execution success.
Webinar
One team. One plan. Total oversight. An integrated CDMO–CRO model for coordinated execution
This on-demand webinar showcases how an integrated CDMO–CRO model supports drug development programs in practice across development, manufacturing, and clinical supply.
Industry Perspectives
Drug development speed: Outcome of early-phase decisions
Discover how early drug development decisions shape how quickly complex programs move in later phases.
Case Study
Accelerating global CVOT execution
See how strategic site selection improved activation timelines and enrollment consistency in a global Phase III cardiovascular trial.
Article
AI and the shift toward more integrated, efficient drug development
Explore how artificial intelligence is fundamentally changing biopharmaceutical development and how CDMO and CRO integration can act as an enabler for this future-forward technology.
Industry Perspectives
What Drives Speed in Complex Drug Development?
Learn what truly drives speed in complex drug development—why coordination, not effort, determines timelines, risk, and execution success.
White paper
Coordinated drug development as an execution framework
Learn how coordinated governance and integrated execution support continuity across clinical research, development, manufacturing, and supply.
White paper
Where innovation and investment reduce drug development risk
Explore how investment strategies are applied in practice and how they support program execution across development, manufacturing, and clinical supply.