Author:
Anil Kane, PhD, MBA
A promising molecule that is demonstrated to be safe and effective in a range of doses in early development is only the beginning. Late-phase scale-up is where scientific potential meets operational reality, and without the right framework, even the most promising oral solid dosage (OSD) programs risk stalling. At this stage, formulation complexity, process variability, and regulatory scrutiny converge, turning scale-up into a high-stakes endeavor with many variables. The question is no longer whether the product can be made, but whether it can be made reliably and consistently while meeting all the quality specifications at a commercial scale without introducing delays, rework, batch failures, or compliance risk.
To scale with confidence, teams must align technical expertise with operational strategy, bringing adaptability, foresight, and successful implementation of each step. Where others falter and stall, late-phase scale-up can be done confidently with proper planning and execution.
Late-phase success begins with designing for manufacturability and anchoring critical quality attributes in scalable controls. Tech transfer functions best as a translation of product intent, rather than a file handoff: development data, analytical methods, and tacit process know-how move with the product so that performance remains consistent and validation proceeds more quickly.
Many organizations gain leverage from platform experience and qualified equipment trains. These elements compress development cycles, stabilize outcomes, and support regulatory confidence. Predictive tools, such as in silico modeling, scale-up simulations, and design of experiments, help teams make earlier decisions with clearer evidence. For example, roller-compaction simulations can reveal equipment compatibility and process behavior before full-scale trials. This approach not only saves time and materials, but catches problems before they can derail a product while minimizing potential hiccups.
Execution choices are most concrete when made in the context of commercial constraints.
In late-phase, missteps are rarely isolated. Timeline slips, revalidation, inspection findings, and launch delays are common downstream effects that consume capacity and erode confidence. Programs that reduce these exposures usually emphasize early regulatory alignment among process design, validation strategy, and control frameworks.
Where high-potency APIs (HPAPIs) are involved, layered protection is the norm. Primary containment through hard-engineered barriers and closed transfers sits alongside facility controls and pressure management, with administrative safeguards for access, documentation, and health monitoring. Multidisciplinary coordination of process development, analytics, and tech transfer is necessary to work as a single system in order to scale while maintaining quality. Using prior knowledge and data-driven tools can help anticipate and avert failures and determine when processes and supply chains can absorb variability without sacrificing compliance or quality. Resilient processes and anticipating for risks can turn a volatile late-phase landscape into predictable execution.
The right CDMO partnership turns strategy into sustained performance by anticipating late-phase complexities and solving them without disrupting progress. A capable partner offers:
It is crucial to find the right CDMO that is prepared for all steps towards commercialization.
Late-phase OSD scale-up can be a hurdle, but it’s a hurdle that can be prepared. With the right strategy, disciplined tech transfer, and a collaboration model built for resilience, late-stage scale-up and commercial readiness can be met with confidence.